<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Monster of Florence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2006/07/06/the-monster-of-florence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2006/07/06/the-monster-of-florence/</link>
	<description>Media, Baseball, Boston, the Red Sox, Music, Literature, and Mnookins</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mixnpour</title>
		<link>http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2006/07/06/the-monster-of-florence/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>mixnpour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 19:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2006/07/06/the-monster-of-florence/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I share your admiration of Malcolm's "The Journalist and the Murderer," but in justifying its classic status, you fudged the publication date. The pair of articles that the book was based on were published in the New Yorker in 1989, and the book itself was first printed in 1990 -- still roughly a decade short of "a quarter of a century".

&lt;i&gt;Good point -- and fixed.
- Seth&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I share your admiration of Malcolm&#8217;s &#8220;The Journalist and the Murderer,&#8221; but in justifying its classic status, you fudged the publication date. The pair of articles that the book was based on were published in the New Yorker in 1989, and the book itself was first printed in 1990 &#8212; still roughly a decade short of &#8220;a quarter of a century&#8221;.</p>
<p><i>Good point &#8212; and fixed.<br />
- Seth</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
