After reading CHB’s column, in horror I may add, do you have a sudden urge to move back in with your parents and set up shop in the basement? Could CHB have actually done some research instead of recycling a 10 year old cliche/joke? It shocks me that the Globe’s editors allowed it. Not for it being accurate, but rather because it proved how distant old media is from new media. Insult us all you want guys, but the reason we do what we do these days on blogs, YouTube, Second Life and various other new media goodies is because a lot of your content is awful, tired and outdated.
MS
]]>Did you mean “in fact” instead of “in face”. At least it’s something that sneaks by spellchecker.
Regarding Shaughnessy, I stopped reading him long ago, but Curt’s comment prompted me to check that hideous column. Never again.
]]>Surprised me, certainly. I don’t mind athelete criticism, and certainly would not cede the task of reporting to the individuals themselves, but after years and years of his bile I’ve given up. Haven’t read him in years, and don’t plan to again.
Like yourself, I respect any writer that can take a difficult position and defend it without reservation, but too often for CHB a “difficult position” equates to “ad hominem attacks” and unnecessarily vitriolic commentary. Bob Ryan can make a point - and a pointed one at that - without resorting to the poison pen as Shaugnessy does.
As for his ability to strike a nerve, I don’t see that as a particularly admirable ability. How difficult is it, after all, to incite a mob?
But to each their own, and so forth.
]]>“You are my second favorite player, right behind my childhood hero Ken Griffey Jr, and just ahead of Roger Clemens. Is there any chance you could leave me a ticket to see you pitch in Seattle this summer?”
]]>