Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/2/d166085970/htdocs/blog/index.php:11) in /homepages/2/d166085970/htdocs/blog/wp-commentsrss2.php on line 8
Comments on: Can you hear me now? The Daly fiasco echo chamber, day two. http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2007/12/12/can-you-hear-me-now-the-daly-fiasco-echo-chamber-day-two/ Media, Baseball, Boston, the Red Sox, Music, Literature, and Mnookins Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:10:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: lperdue http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2007/12/12/can-you-hear-me-now-the-daly-fiasco-echo-chamber-day-two/#comment-322402 Sat, 15 Dec 2007 04:52:49 +0000 http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2007/12/12/can-you-hear-me-now-the-daly-fiasco-echo-chamber-day-two/#comment-322402 As a _former_ J-prof who couldn't tolerate the political bullshot of the University of California system, I can say that your comments are on target. This sort of mushy thinking is a necessary part of accommodating oneself to the bureaucracy of a tenure track. An accommodation which is not compatible with solid journalism. Or critical thinking for that matter. As a _former_ J-prof who couldn’t tolerate the political bullshot of the University of California system, I can say that your comments are on target.

This sort of mushy thinking is a necessary part of accommodating oneself to the bureaucracy of a tenure track. An accommodation which is not compatible with solid journalism.

Or critical thinking for that matter.

]]> by: Gee http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2007/12/12/can-you-hear-me-now-the-daly-fiasco-echo-chamber-day-two/#comment-320975 Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:02:20 +0000 http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2007/12/12/can-you-hear-me-now-the-daly-fiasco-echo-chamber-day-two/#comment-320975 <i>and maybe messed it up <b>catastrophically</b>.</i> Thus revised, I would agree with your sentiments, plynch22. It was a front page article, and one needn't think it was intended maliciously to acknowledge that it was an utter debacle and an embarrassment. I agree that the reporter's age has nothing to do with anything, but I think a vastly more important point is that this drivel was on the front page of a once-great newspaper. and maybe messed it up catastrophically.

Thus revised, I would agree with your sentiments, plynch22. It was a front page article, and one needn’t think it was intended maliciously to acknowledge that it was an utter debacle and an embarrassment.

I agree that the reporter’s age has nothing to do with anything, but I think a vastly more important point is that this drivel was on the front page of a once-great newspaper.

]]> by: plynch22 http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2007/12/12/can-you-hear-me-now-the-daly-fiasco-echo-chamber-day-two/#comment-320234 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:36:48 +0000 http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2007/12/12/can-you-hear-me-now-the-daly-fiasco-echo-chamber-day-two/#comment-320234 Walter: Answer this. In the deepest part of your heart, do you really think the Washington Post set out to write a "partisan hit job" on Obama, or set out to examine the falsehoods that cling to him, and maybe messed it up a little. Walter: Answer this. In the deepest part of your heart, do you really think the Washington Post set out to write a “partisan hit job” on Obama, or set out to examine the falsehoods that cling to him, and maybe messed it up a little.

]]> by: walter10021 http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2007/12/12/can-you-hear-me-now-the-daly-fiasco-echo-chamber-day-two/#comment-320177 Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:05:43 +0000 http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2007/12/12/can-you-hear-me-now-the-daly-fiasco-echo-chamber-day-two/#comment-320177 yeah, except that you're obviously a dick, which is why people hate journalists. That Obama story was no Watergate, baby, and it's plain ignorant to pretend that it is. The piece was a partisan hit job, one of many from the WP, and the fact that the hack who done it was precocious is besides the fucken point. yeah, except that you’re obviously a dick, which is why people hate journalists. That Obama story was no Watergate, baby, and it’s plain ignorant to pretend that it is. The piece was a partisan hit job, one of many from the WP, and the fact that the hack who done it was precocious is besides the fucken point.

]]>