Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /homepages/2/d166085970/htdocs/blog/index.php:11) in /homepages/2/d166085970/htdocs/blog/wp-commentsrss2.php on line 8
Comments on: Times story shows, yet again, that the national media should stop ripping off Walter Robinson http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2008/02/25/times-story-shows-yet-again-that-the-national-media-should-stop-ripping-off-walter-robinson/ Media, Baseball, Boston, the Red Sox, Music, Literature, and Mnookins Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:58:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: strungoutonsix http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2008/02/25/times-story-shows-yet-again-that-the-national-media-should-stop-ripping-off-walter-robinson/#comment-426723 Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:16:36 +0000 http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2008/02/25/times-story-shows-yet-again-that-the-national-media-should-stop-ripping-off-walter-robinson/#comment-426723 Seth, missing your comments on spring training so far. What's happened to you?? Seth, missing your comments on spring training so far. What’s happened to you??

]]> by: kinshane http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2008/02/25/times-story-shows-yet-again-that-the-national-media-should-stop-ripping-off-walter-robinson/#comment-406073 Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:05:23 +0000 http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2008/02/25/times-story-shows-yet-again-that-the-national-media-should-stop-ripping-off-walter-robinson/#comment-406073 How 'bout them Red Sox? How ’bout them Red Sox?

]]> by: sharrock http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2008/02/25/times-story-shows-yet-again-that-the-national-media-should-stop-ripping-off-walter-robinson/#comment-405972 Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:42:37 +0000 http://www.sethmnookin.com/blog/2008/02/25/times-story-shows-yet-again-that-the-national-media-should-stop-ripping-off-walter-robinson/#comment-405972 Excellent comparison to the previous Globe pieces. It seems the Times did not know quite how to focus its story (too many cooks) so they made sure they had all the info they could muster in the story. Nothing shocking was revealed but McCain promptly painted himself into a corner with his strong denials. We'll see how that works out for him. I do tend to think these types of stories that have some substance but not a wealth of facts or evidence or a damaging timeline get formulated different in the past as current news media seems obsessed in drawing readers away from the blogosphere. (On a side note, if CNN pushes blogs down my throat anymore I am going to impale myself.) As far as the sexual relationship, it sounds better for McCain if he was sleeping with her. I will not be voting for McCain but I'd rather think he used his influence because he was getting some love from a woman 25 years his younger rather than he gives special consideration (and potentially questionable memos) to any and all lobbyists. Excellent comparison to the previous Globe pieces. It seems the Times did not know quite how to focus its story (too many cooks) so they made sure they had all the info they could muster in the story. Nothing shocking was revealed but McCain promptly painted himself into a corner with his strong denials. We’ll see how that works out for him.

I do tend to think these types of stories that have some substance but not a wealth of facts or evidence or a damaging timeline get formulated different in the past as current news media seems obsessed in drawing readers away from the blogosphere. (On a side note, if CNN pushes blogs down my throat anymore I am going to impale myself.)

As far as the sexual relationship, it sounds better for McCain if he was sleeping with her. I will not be voting for McCain but I’d rather think he used his influence because he was getting some love from a woman 25 years his younger rather than he gives special consideration (and potentially questionable memos) to any and all lobbyists.

]]>